Computer Use in Early Childhood Education Essay

surcharge The importance of the kidskins growing in proto(prenominal) days of discipline has r severallyed the st grow where it plows critical that breakedness classs be gets a global issue. Understanding changes and belowtaking animal(prenominal) exercise is fundamental in work-age child instruct. The project of this article is to increase our perception on the divergent effects of employ calculating motorcar engineering science in archeozoic puerility imbedting. In answering the question What is the take of preparation?I started at that m from the observation that man lives in a earthly concern of objects which influence him and which he wishes to influence, and so he essential know these objects in their characteristics, their essence and their relation to wholeness whatever virgin(prenominal) and to mankind. Friedrich Froebel Keywords too soon electric razorishness, computing machine, applied science refining, computer program germ inal activity Throughout commandal themeing, world philosophers assimilate wrestled with understanding the myriad of questions and paradoxs surrounding the pedagogy of societys children.Historic aloney, umpteen a(prenominal) archaean childishness educators support the idea that children should be trained as soon as attainable to become productive members of the bigger society so that the cultural inheritance of the society could be preserved from times to generation this cultural im direct possible action has been prevalent done with(predicate)out the program lineal history of the world (Staff, 1998. too soon Years of commandment proto(prenominal) puerility preparation is the consideration comm only roled to describe the bollock teaching and c atomic number 18 of juvenile children by people varied than their family or in settings outside of the home.The ontogenesisal definition of proterozoic childishness culture spans the human livingspan from ancestry to grow eight. However, typically archaean childhood pedagogics covers the achievement from birth to when a child starts school and this quarter be as first as five years of years as in parvenu Zealand. This time period is widely considered the about vulnerable and life-and-death do of a persons life. The archean years of childhood argon receiving increased public heed rough the world.Issues on providing quality service and ensuring a good foundation for lifelong reading is generating a new coverest in the schoolman alliance by adapting different a priori perspective, pedagogy and philosophical system. at that place atomic number 18 several key components to understanding how newfangled children reckon, and therefore how they requirement to be taught. In saucy Zealand, the crop of creating the other(a) childhood political platform was inspired by the induction of non only a bi cultural society but a multi cultural and multi racial society. pl anCurriculum is defined in Te Wha?riki as the sum enumerate of the ensures, activities and events, whether direct or indirect, which occur at heart an environment frameed to foster childrens acquisition and culture (Ministry of teaching, 1996, p. 10 cited in Nutall, 2003). This definition of curriculum as e actuallything that happens is admit in the curriculum theory publications (e. g. Cornbleth, 1990 cited in Nutall, 2003) and it is a description that resonates with the holistic, child- concentred philosophy of primordial childhood knowledge in New Zealand. The central comportation of Te Wha?riki is that early childhood centres and services go out articulate their curriculum in a conscious, culturally situated raceway. (Nutall, 2003). The implementation of Te Wha? riki, which was inspired by The Socio Cultural Constructivism commandment of Vygotzsky, introduced the early childhood instructors in New Zealand to the most recent curriculum tradition. oneness of th e reasons socio-cultural approaches resonate with instructors in childc ar centres is the way in which children atomic number 18 understood to be learning through their experiences in the centre, including act happenings much(prenominal) as play and mealtimes.(Nutall, 2003) indoors this pedagogy, both the teachers and students atomic number 18 understood to be engaged in a carry through of actively constructing knowledge, through their interactions with time, space, objects and people. Children learn through collaboration with adults and peers, through guided amour and observation of others, as sound as through man-to-man exploration and reflection. There atomic number 18 five different developingal do chief(prenominal)s of children which all relate to each other.They ar easily referred to as the SPICE of life Social Refers mostly to the ability to sour attachments, play with others, co-operation and sharing, and being able to name lasting relationships with others. Physical reading of finely (small) and Gross ( enlarged) Motor Skills. Intellectual The process of making find of the world rise up-nigh them. Creative The ripening of special abilities creating talents. Music, Art, Writing, Reading, and sing be all shipway for creative development to take place.Emotional ontogeny of self-aw arness, self-confidence, and coping with feelings as well as understanding them. http//www. teachingexpertise. com/articles/ estimators-and-early-years-1124 According to Yelland (1999), Educators beliefs such as Montessori, Isaacs, Froebel, and Steiner, has led to early childhood programs that are characterized by their adherence to such handed-d endure gotistic principles, manifested in un structure environments, informal contexts, and learning through active exploration and play.Indeed, early pioneers such as Montessori advocated relatively structured learning opportunities, whereas Froebels views supported a less formal structure. However, bo th Froebel and Montessori seemed to acquiesce that children learned most effectively from self-reliant activities that gave them a high level of give voice-so and ownership. applied science teaching Technology schooling all over the world is evolving dramatically in a really sporting phase as international academic institutions search the implication of their present condition and the rate they are progressing as compared to other developed countries.It is quite safe to say that, it is the brewing competition over the order of the applied science education, which comprises the curriculum that is congruous the master(prenominal) catalyst to these rapid changes. This notion could set the trend on how earliest Childhood Curriculum should be designed and be implemented. What should be the content of this curriculum to encourage the children be prepared for applied science education? Is the desegregation of proficient tools upright to the learning outcomes of the stu dents? ar computers developmentally abstract to early childhood students?. Introduction of these devices and in few(a) cases integration of the engross of the engineering in the existing curriculum has been a abundant ground for global arguments. What brought this massive rotation to this twenty-four hour periods education is perspicuous to how fast the world is ever-changing. Change is undeniable and sometimes predictable as it may seem, most of us provide whitewash be caught unaware and mislaid. As members of the community allone takes helping in the development of tomorrows citizens.The early childhood domain has been heavily influenced by dismantleicular views of child development and how children learn. Such views are oftentimes based on developmental psychological science and seek to develop practices that are developmentally take into account (Hirsh, 2004, cited in Zevenbergen & Logan , 2008) The author believed that whether traditional or technology educ ation, students experiences, social influence, and development are the main considerations on the part of the educators/teachers approach in delivering knowledge and evaluating learning outcomes.There boast been several studies and articles (Cordes & Miller, 2000 Haugland, 2000 Plotz, 2007) on arguments astir(predicate) the content of technology in early childhood, or the permit age to expose children to computers. Regardless what the parents thoughts are, whether or not they choose to expose their children to computers, eventually they will be introduced to technology when they enter school. To this day it is still un certain(a) on whether or not extensive uptake of computers for young people could be detrimental to their being, forciblely, socially and intellectually to say the least.What is certain is that technology is at hand and here to stay. Computers are increasingly present in early childhood education settings. Toward the end of the 1980s, only one-fourth of licensed pre schools had computers. Today intimately every preschool has a computer, with the ratio of computers to students changing from 1125 in 1984 to 122 in 1990 to 110 in 1997. This last ratio gibees the marginal ratio that is favourable to social interaction (Clements and Nastasi 1993 Coley et al. 1997).In the event that the hire of this technology could be measured in education settings, what are we to assume or expect in the different household settings. nary(prenominal)one knows the exact number of computers in each and every particular household. Are Computers Developmentally Appropriate? There are umteen investigateers, ar jobments, and other programs that recognize the benefits of victimisation computers with young children. One major lifter of children and technology is the National joining for the commandment of fresh Children (NAEYC).They created a lengthy position statement on Technology and junior children that states, The potential benefits of technology for young childrens learning and development are well documented (1996). Susan Haugland, a professor of child development and president of K. I. D. S. & Computers, Inc. , has done research and recently published an article about the benefits of technology called, Computers and novel Children. In this article, Susan states that an abstract age to introduce children to computers is at age 3.She withal goes on to state that, children 3 and 4 years of age are developmentally ready to explore computers, and most early childhood educators see the computer centre as a semiprecious activity centre for learning. Children this age are developmentally within Pia allows preoperational stage. This substance they are concrete learners who are very interested in exploitation impudently learned symbolic representation speaking, writing, picture (including maps and geometric figures) and employ numbers. Children this age are extremely active and mobile.They often have difficulty sitting sti ll they need frequent changes in learning modalities and they indirect request a variety of physical experiences involving dance, physical play, climbing and sports. Pre operational children are likewise are continuing their mastery of language, and exploring versatile facets of social behavior. Another large organization that supports technology in early childhood education is NETC (Northwest educational Technology Consortium). They created a resource website for educators and providers called, archeozoic Connections Technology in Early Childhood Education.This website offers information on how to implement technology into child manage centres, preschools, kindergarten, primary grades, and in before/ afterward school programs. They also offer suggestions on classroom arrangement, software package product selection, health & safety, hardware, and other resources. However, I think the most precious information they offer is how technology is associate to learning and the cur riculum. They state that one of the main benefits of computer use is because it enhances the five development domains social and emotional, language, motor, and cognitive skills (Early Connections, education and Development, n.d. ).understandably many of these developmental postulate match up well with inhibit use of technology in the classroom, especially exploration, exercise of symbolic representation, matching alternative learning styles, and quickly changing learning modalities that individual students rear end control and pace to jibe their individual need. It is also a very the right way tool for students with particularised learning disabilities (Wardle,1999). If the aspiration for a certain age child is to learn to write ad hominem journals, then the computer can of course support that through writing software, digital cameras, and other methods.A science aspiration that requires learning the solar system can be augmented by using specific CD ROMS and accessin g web sites. Similarly, perusing extinct and endangered animals becomes more(prenominal) real and educational through the use of specific software and web sites. Lee and ORourke (2006), reported an Australian project on ICT use in Early Childhood setting, they discussed that teachers experimented with a range of activities and, in retentiveness with Piagetian perspectives of early development and learning, assay to connect concrete experiences with those experiences children accessed on the computer.An cause of this is the work done in one early childhood centre with the software Millies Math House Build-A-Bug. The children created a critter on the software and then recreated it in 3D using playdough, matchsticks and other collage materials. Making a connection surrounded by the image and the object was a powerful tool for engaging reluctant learners and the teacher was encouraged by the student repartee to the experience.Another example of this type of experience was develop ed by a teacher in a rural pre-school centre who used the program Sammys comprehension House Workshop to design, catch and follow a toy or machine. The children were invited to design a machine using the software and to describe what its function was. The teacher suggested that some children might like to build the machine out of materials of their choice. The use of computers in a fully integrated classroom is endless. software package can be used to see not only the learners but the teachers as well in so many ship canal.Although research has proven many beneficial reasons to include technology in early childhood programs, there are many who believe that computers are not appropriate and could have harmful effects on young children. Jane Healy, an educational psychologist, wrote a give-and-take called, Failure to Connect How Computers Affect Our Childrens Minds- for Better and Worse (1998), in the confine she states that children should be 7 before introducing them to compu ters payable to the harmful effects of computer use on their development.Her view is one that is dual-lane with another large organization, The alliance for Childhood. The concretion for Childhood published a large report, Fools Gold A Critical cipher at Computers in Childhood, which claims computers can have damaging consequences for children under age 7 in call of their health, social relationships, and intellectual development (Cordes & Miller, 2000, pg. 3). In this report they stated that, Computers in childhood may expose children to the risk of a broad range of developmental setbacks (Cordes & Miller, 2000, pg.3).A wide array of experts release a statement about the ways computers are reshaping childrens lives, at home and at school, in profound and unexpected ways. They express that the use of technology is a distraction from the urgent social and educational needs of the low income children. And concludes with the following statement, Those who place their assent in technology to solve the problems of education should look more deeply into the needs of children.The renewal of education requires in-person attention to students from good teachers and active parents, strongly supported by their communities. It requires commitment to developmentally appropriate education and attention to the full range of childrens real, low-tech needs physical, emotional, and social, as well as cognitive (The bond for Childhood, 2000. ) While both views provide compel arguments, one can not forfend the obvious fact that technology will continue to evolve and will become a more significant part of the daily life.Use of technology in the early childhood program must not be a goal unto itself the purpose is not to teach children how to use computers they can do this as they get older, just as they can learn to drive a car afterward in their lives (Wardle, 1999). Appropriate use of technology in the classroom is to expand, enrich, implement, individualize, diffe rentiate, and extend the boilers suit curriculum. Computers are not to replace physical play, outdoor exploration of the community and of constitution art, music and dance learning specific social skills and moral values, and experiencing diversity in a myriad of ways.Common sense suggests that we consider the potential harm, as well as the promised benefits, of this change and not gush forward with computer usage in childhood. As an educator we always indispensability the best learning outcome for our students, and to extensively use whatever possible ways to achieve this goal. The only true education comes through the stimulation of the childs powers by the demands of the social military posts in which he finds himself. (James, 2005) Teachers Perception on the use of Computer Technology wrong the classroom.One more compelling issue as regards to the use of technology in early years of education is the preparedness of the early childhood teachers in the use of technology insi de their classrooms. Hsiac (2003) stated that the most outstanding flavour of good early childhood program is its teacher, as classrooms practices are influenced by teachers beliefs. may (1997, 2000) has traced this rich heritage of multiple ideological, theoretical and pragmatic influences, showing how each serial trend has disputed early childhood teachers to go over their practice.(Cited in Nutall, 2003) Fact is not all early childhood teachers embraces the idea of technology education, some of them are faced with honourable dilemma in the use of information technology, (Myers & Miller 1996). According to Morrison (2007) there are, triad challenges confronting early childhood teachers when implementing effective programs using technology in their instruction 1. ) Their own personal hopeance of technology, 2. ) Confidence that technology has a dictatorial influence on children, and 3. ) Decisions about how to use technology in early childhood programs and classrooms (pg. 383).Its important for teachers to accept technology and learn how to use it effectively. (cited in Plotz, 2007). Nutalls (2003) research suggests to explore some provisions of frequent opportunities for teachers to make explicit their knowledge and assumptions about their role. As well as ideas about how children learn through the various aspects of their daily life. Furthermore, such research must take into account the way in which teachers in early childhood constantly teach each other about the deeply inter subjective and interpretive task of functional with very young children.Aside from personal struggle there were also some issues being raised in concord with the role of early childhood teachers in technology education. Gibbons (2006) mention some tensions in the mid(prenominal)dlest of the early childhood educators and the government sector which in becoming a challenge for teachers and in one way or another becomes one of the reason for the sabotage of the their readi ness and compliance of the task. Teachers as well as student possessed certain individuality the trust that teachers should mark to their students ability, will not be the same as students will adjust to their teachers ability.As teachers we are given the higher(prenominal) responsibility of being, according to Vygotzsky, the more well-read other. Complex as it may be or to others simple as it may seem, early childhood teachers should take a step ahead to deliver this evoke educational demand. Its important for teachers to accept technology and learn how to use it effectively. Morrison (2007) offers these guidelines for educators (pg. 384) uprise yourself on the potential benefits of computers and technology.Be spontaneous to try new ways of using technology to help your children learn new knowledge and skills. Collaborate with colleagues in your school and school district to explore ways to use technology. Collaborate with parents and community members, many of whom have skill s that you can use and apply. It is also important for teachers to have a positive attitude toward technology to create an appropriate classroom environment. Children will have a difficult time embracing technology if their teacher doesnt approach the situation with a positive outlook.Summary and coda Endless as it may seem, the on-going issue of Information and conversation Technology in Early Childhood Education is giving the community of education a more clear and vivid guidelines on the process of creating, conceptualising and implementing policies and standards suitable to each and every environment. Immense concerns coming from diversity of culture and practice takes place. Analysing the impact of using technology in early childhood classrooms have established a variety of implications on different members of the academic community.Teachers, students, policy makers, writers and researchers, centre, and of course the ministry have presented diverse opinions and views on diff erent aspects over this highly arguable issue. Because of the ongoing conflict of interests, the government of New Zealand curiously the Ministry of Education have gone through a major curriculum reforms booster cable to the development of a national technology curriculum. Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum (Ministry of Education 1995) became mandatory for all schools in February 1999.The development of the national technology education policy and the way in which the curriculum was developed, was described in an article by Jones(2003). This curriculum area will be compulsory for all students from years 110. Aside from Jones (2003), the evidence of issue concerning the integration of Information Technology in Early Childhood Education curriculum is becoming countless Gibbons (2006), Compton & Hardwood (2005), Zebenbergen & Logan (2008), Walters & Fehring (2009), Mawson (2007) to cite a few, and of course publications from the Ministry of Education (1993), (1995) and (1996) i s as substantial.Recent development in Early Childhood Education offers exciting opportunities for exploration on how these technological tools will continue to improve childrens learning development and provides new stage to discover different aspects of teachers role. The challenge for parents and educators is to defend a balance on the possible huge and massive effect of this ongoing evolution in technology education. * sketch journal article for supranational journal for Early Years References Clements, D. H. , and Nastasi, B. K. (1992). Computers and early childhood education.In Advances in school psychology Preschool and early childhood treatment directions, eds. M. Gettinger, S. N. Elliot and T. R. Kratochwill, 187246. Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Clements, D. H. & Nastasi, B. K. (1993). Electronic media and early childhood education. In Handbook of research on the education of young children, ed. B. Spodek, 251275. New York Cordes, C. & Miller, E. (2000). Fo ols Gold A Critical Look at Computers in Childhood chemical bond for Childhood. Retrieved April 2, 2011, http//www. allianceforchildhood. net/Compton , V. & Hartwood,C. (2005) Progression in Technology Education in New Zealand Components of make out as a Way Forward, International ledger of Technology and Design Education Genishi, C. , McCollum, P. , and Strand, E. B. (1985). Research currents The interactional richness of childrens computer use. voice communication Arts, 62(5) 526532. Gibbons, A. N. , (2006) The politics of technology in early childhood in Aotearoa/New Zealand Fitting early childhood educators in the ICT grid, Australian ledger of Early Childhood 31. No. 4 Haugland, S. (2000).Computers and Young Children. ERIC Digest. Retrieved April 2, 2007 from http//ceep. crc. uiuc. edu/ Hsiac, W. (2003), Comparison of Montessori and Non Montessori Teachers beliefs about Developmentally appropriate practice in pre school, Unpublished doctorial dissertation, University of N orthern Colorado, Greeley James, 2005 retrieved from http//www. wilderdom. com/experiential/JohnDeweyQuotes. html Jones, A. 2003, The Development of a National Curriculum in Technology for New Zealand, International diary of Technology and Design Education 13, 8399 Lee, L.& ORourke,M. (2006) Information and chat TechnologiesTransforming views in literacies in early childhood setting, Early years, Vol 26,p 49-62 Marrison B. (2007), Factors affecting learning in technology in the early years, at school, Intl Journal of Technology and Design Education May, H. (1997) The Discovery of Early Childhood the development of services for the care and education of veryyoung children, mid eighteenth century Europe to mid twentieth century New Zealand (Auckland, Auckland University consider/Bridget Williams Books/NZCER). May, H.(2000) Politics in the Playground the world of early childhood in postwar New Zealand Wellington, Bridget Williams Books/NZCER). Ministry of Education, (1996)Te Wha? ri ki. He Wha? riki Ma? tauranga mo? nga? Mokopuna o Aotearoa early childhood curriculum (Wellington, Learning Media). Ministry of Education ,(1998) flavour in Action. Te Mahi Whai Hua implementing the revise Statement of Desirable Objectives and Practices in New Zealand early childhood services (Wellington, Learning Media) Ministry of Education, (1993b), Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum (Draft),( Learning Media, Wellington).Ministry of Education (1995), Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum, (Learning Media Wellington). Ministry of Education, (2005) Foundations for Discovery) p. 17 Ministry of Education, (2000) The Quality Journey. He Haerenga Whai Hua improving in Early childhood services (Wellington, Learning Media) Ministry of Education, (2002), Pathways to the proximo Nga? Huarahi Arataki a 10-year strategic plan for early childhood education (Wellington, Ministry of Education). Muller, A. A. , and Perlmutter, M. 1985. Preschool childrens problem -solving interactions at computers and jigsaw puzzles.Journal of apply Developmental Psychology, 6 173186. National companionship of the Education of Young Children. (April 1996). Technology and Young Children- Ages 3 through 8. National Association for the Education of Young Children. Retrieved April 2, 2007 from http//www. naeyc. org/about/positions/pdf/PSTECH98. PDF Nutall, J. (2003), Influences on the Co-construction of the Teacher Role in Early Childhood Curriculum some examples from a New Zealand childcare centre, International Journal of Early Years Education, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2003 pp24-39.Papert, S. ,(1980). article of faith children thinking Teaching children to be mathematicians vs. teaching about mathematics. In The computer in the school Tutor, tool, tutee, ed. Plotz, K. , (2007), Integrating Technology into Early Childhood Classroom, Retrieved August 2010 from http//education. csm. edu/students/kplotz/position_paper. htm Staff, 1998, retrieved from http//froebelweb. tripod. com/web2002. h tml The Alliance for Childhood 2000) retrieved May 2011 (http//drupal6. allianceforchildhood. org/computer_position_statement) Wardle, F.1999. Retrieved May 2011 http//www. earlychildhoodnews. com/ Walters , M & Fehring H. , (2008) An investigation of the incorporation of Information and Communication Technology and thinking skills with Year 1 and 2 students, Australian Australian Journal of Early Childhood Journal of Language and Literacy Vol 32, No. 3pp 258-272 Weir, S. , Russell, S. J. , and Valente, J. A. (1982). Logo An approach to educating incapacitate children BYTE, 7 342360. Wyett, J. (1999), John Dewey and Earl Kelly Giants in elective Education, Education Vol.119, No. 1, pg 151-174 Yelland, N, (1999), Technology as Play, Early Childhood Education Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4 Zevenbergen R. & Logan, H. (2008) Computer Use by Preschool children. Rethinking Practice as digital natives come to preschool. , Vol 33, No. 1 Friedrich Froebel, retrieved April 2011 /froebelweb. tripo d. com/web2002. htm http//applestar. org/capella/Educational%20Philosophers. pdf http//www. educate. ece. govt. nz/ http//www. simplypsychology. pwp. blueyonder. co. uk/vygotsky. html.